:star2: Bhakti-Ratna Course 4 - (Registration open) :star2:
Prīti Sandarbha (continued) - By Babaji Satyanarayana Dasa
Vaiśeṣika Sūtras of Kaṇāda with Praśastapāda Bhāṣya - By Babaji Satyanarayana Dasa
Sanskrit for Beginners by Gururaja
:star2: Bhakti-Ratna Course 4 - (Registration open) :star2:
Prīti Sandarbha (continued) - By Babaji Satyanarayana Dasa
Vaiśeṣika Sūtras of Kaṇāda with Praśastapāda Bhāṣya - By Babaji Satyanarayana Dasa
Sanskrit for Beginners by Gururaja
Enroll now Enroll
Enroll now Enroll
What Is Jnana?
Articles by Satyanarayana Dasa Philosophy Shastra

What Is Jnana?

By Satyanarayana Dasa

The word “jnana” is usually translated as “knowledge,” but, in fact, it is not that simple.  In English, one says, “I know the name of a good restaurant,” or “I know Java,” and it is easily understood.  But the simplicity of the word “know” or “knowledge” is not the same in Sanskrit.

Before beginning the explanation of jnana, let’s look at a hypothetical situation.  A man is in a coma for 10 years and wakes up in his hospital bed.  Sitting on the table next to him is an iPad, left there by a visitor.  The man picks up the iPad and looks at it.  Through his senses, he makes some observations about it, but he can’t really figure out what it is.  Later the visitor explains it to him.

“It is a small computer and was invented about two years ago”

“You can read books, newspapers, and even magazines on it.”

“You can listen to music on it, play games on it, and watch movies on it. “

“You can use it almost anywhere, and it doesn’t require any wires”

“In some schools, these are being provided to children instead of giving them textbooks.”

Finally, the visitor turns on the iPad and gives the man a demo of it.  The man now has some knowledge of an iPad.

In this example, there is a subject (the man), an object (the iPad), and there is knowledge.  Initially the man has a few observation, which he makes on his own, then he is given some information (in this case, verbally), and finally he sees it being operated.  Through the use of his senses and intellect, the man now has some, but not complete, knowledge of an iPad. Whatever knowledge he acquires in this way, creates a specific impression or modification in his mind, called citta-vritti.

Knowledge basically is the relation between a word and the object denoted by it. By this knowledge, the subject can deal with or think of the object. The knowledge can be of a substance, a quality, a class, a relation or an action. All the knowledge we posses can be subsumed in one of these categories.

In Sanskrit the word jnanam is derived from the root jna avabodhane (to know) and has three etymological meanings:

1. As a verbal activity or state of being, jnaptih jnanam means understanding, awareness, experience, knowing, consciousness. Jnana in this sense is without any content. It does not reveal anything except the subject itself. It is the intransitive usage of the word jnana, for example, “to know”.

2. As an instrument (jnayate anena iti jnanam), it denotes that by which something is known, or that which reveals something (artha-prakasakah). Jnana in this sense has content. It has a subject to which it reveals and an object which is revealed by it. In Vedantic terminology, it is called vrtti-jnana. In the example above, the information about the iPad, would be the “instrument” which allows someone to have knowledge of the iPad.

3. As a substratum (jnanam asti asminiti), it is that which knows or possesses knowledge.  It is consciousness.

The second meaning is the most general meaning of the word jnana. The function of knowledge, taken in this sense, is to reveal an object. It reveals an object to a conscious self, atma.  By revealing the object, it also reveals itself. This is described as svayam-prakasa, self-luminous. The self knows what is revealed to it by knowledge. Knowledge, however, cannot know the object it reveals.  That which knows but does not reveal the objects outside it except itself is called pratyak or svasmai svayam prakasa, self-luminous and self conscious. This is the characteristic feature of the self.

Knowledge of The Self

The fundamental difference between knowledge (used in the second sense) and the self is that knowledge reveals an object for a knowing subject (atma) while the self, although it illuminates or makes the body conscious, cannot reveal the objects but knows what is revealed to it by knowledge. Knowledge thus belongs to a subject and has a content or reference to an object.

Atma, or self, is called jnana-svarupa to signify its conscious nature. Here, the word jnana is not used in the general sense, but to signify that it is conscious and not inert, and is the substratum of knowledge. But it does not mean that it is mere consciousness as contended by Advaitvadis. It is conscious and possesses consciousness.

It also does not mean that it possesses knowledge in the normal or popular sense of the word. Not knowing this distinction, some scholars misconstrue that atma, or the pure soul, is full of knowledge, omniscient. They propose that if the soul’s ignorance is removed, then the atma will be automatically situated in knowledge.

Five States of Existence in Three Bodies

A human being a made up of the atma and a material body. The material body is made from the products of prakrti (the causal state of matter), and it has three divisions:

  • The gross body is the visible body consisting of hair, skin, blood, fat, veins, bones marrow etc.
  • The subtle body is made of five pranas, five motor senses, five cognitive senses, mind, intellect, ego and chitta.
  • The causal body consists of ignorance (avidya in the form of svabhava and karma).

Based upon these three bodies we experience five states of existence: wakefulness, dreams, deep sleep, unconscious, and samadhi.

Wakefulness is related to the gross body; dream state to the subtle body; and the remaining three to the causal body. The one who makes these bodies conscious and is beyond them is the atma. He is the only conscious being, jnana-svarupa, and has the potential to know. He exists in all five states of the three bodies, but is completely untouched or affected by them. He is unchanging, and everything else is mutable.

The word jnana is thus used both for atma, and the knowledge acquired as a vrtti through the senses. The confusion arises because of the use of a single word for both. This distinction must be understood clearly to know the nature of atma. The knowledge which arises through the senses, internal and external, is not inherent in the atma.  Atma, by its proximity, infuses consciousness into the chitta, the mind, which comes in contact with sense organs, which in turn contact the sense objects (Bhagavata Purana 6.16.24).

Self-Luminous Knowledge from Sense Perception

The knowledge of an object thus arises when the atma comes into contact with the object through the inner and external senses. This knowledge is called vrtti-jnana, a form of mental modification. (See the second etymological meaning above.)   It undergoes contraction and expansion, warranted by experience, while being conditioned by avidya-karma, ignorance of the self as distinct from the body.  This knowledge is different from jnatrtva of the atma in the sense that the latter is pratyak or conscious of itself while the former is parak or reveals itself to the self. This knowledge is like the luminosity of a flame. Although a substance, it is considered as an attribute of atma because it is sheltered in atma. The knowledge appearing from the sense perception is self luminous but not self conscious. It is called mano-vrtti, a particular state of mind in relation to the object perceived.

Sri Krishna (Bhagavad Gita 13.6) refers to mano-vriti, as cetana, or awareness, and counts it as part of the material body. This cetana should not be confused with the cetana of the atma. Although cetana, or consciousness, is the natural quality of the atma, it is counted as a mental characteristic, because, in the conditioned state, the consciousness of atma is manifest only through the material body, senses and mind. Hence, all knowledge, both valid and illusory, is a mental state.

Sri Kapila says that there are five types of vrittis (Bhagavata Purana 3.26.30):

“The characteristics of buddhi by its various functions, vrittis, are said to be doubt, illusion, valid knowledge, remembrance and sleep.”

All types of experiences, both external and internal, in different states of mind, such as wakeful, dream and deep sleep, fall within these five vrttis. There is no experience outside these vrttis. It may be noted here that even deep sleep is the experience of a type of vrtti. The vrttis are not within atma; therefore, all knowledge is outside atma.


No Knowledge of External Objects in The Self

Atma by itself is devoid of any knowledge of external objects, because there are no vrittis in it. This is experienced by everyone in the state of deep sleep, unconsciousness or samadhi.  If there were any knowledge, as understood in the popular sense, then it should be experienced by a person in deep sleep. But it is everyone’s experience that in deep sleep, one forgets even oneself.

One experiences happiness in deep sleep, therefore, on awakening, one says, “I slept happily. I did not know anything.” One may argue that one does not experience anything in deep sleep because of the covering of ignorance. However, even in nirvikalpaka samadhi, which is realized when one is free of ignorance, there is only experience of bliss but not of knowledge of anything. Patanjali says that when a person becomes free of all vrittis, one is situated in one’s own self (tada drastuh svarupe’vasthanam, Yoga-sutra 1.3). There is no knowledge. Thus, when it is said that atma is jnana-svarupa, it does not mean that it is full of knowledge. It means that it is a conscious being and can have vritti-jnana. The word jnana in jnana-svarupa is used in the sense of first and third derivative meaning, and not the second. Therefore it is understood that atma is conscious by nature, but does not possess any knowledge in it except the sense of “I”.


  • purushottam das May 6, 2012

    it is simply mind boggling. these three distinctions are well explained, but to grasp them completely and put into practice for understanding philosophy, will take long long time. i am simply amazed with the depth of understanding this complex subject by the author.

  • Scooty Ram May 7, 2012

    Thank you for publishing a more easy to understand article.

    While I recollect portion of this article is in line with the book “Fundamentals of Visistadvaita Vedanta”, I am sure there should be some difference in the essential definition of jiva as per gaudiyas.

    By accepting Sri Ramanujas definition of jiva or Sri Jamatr munis definition of jiva, there is no room for acintya bheda and abheda between jiva and brahman.

    Please kindly explain where the concepts of Sri Ramanuja and Sri Jiva differ and where they share the ideas.


    • snd May 8, 2012

      What is the meaning of aprthak-siddhi in Sri Ramanuja’s theology? Is it cintya or acintya?

    • Scooty Ram May 9, 2012

      Aprtak siddhi establishes the AdhAra Adheya , niyantru niyAmya and sesha seshi bhAvam .It applies to all prakaras irrespective of they involving vastu , guna , jati or dravya etc..

      TO the extent you know aprtak siddhi, to that extent it is cintya.

      Sri Jamatr muni says :paramätmaika-sesatva svabhavau sarvada svataha.

      This seshatva explains the relation between soul and brahman.

      However while commenting on this Sri Jiva says it indicates amsatva and uses acintya shakti to explains “svataha”
      A question will rise as to what is the relation between this shakti and brahman.

      To begin with ,you can refer the following books where aprtak siddhi concepts are explained in detail- vedartha sangraham.
      Later its explained more in tattva mukta kalapam , nyaya siddhanjanam , savartha siddhi etc.

      Thank you for showing interest.

  • Kurt Shoemaker May 8, 2012

    Is it accurate to say that knowledge is dependent upon Vritti?

    Also, on a completely separate subject. This article made me think of the Goddess Saraswati and the fact she is usually seen on a white lotus. If we take the white lotus to signify the pure self of the atma, does this signify the separation of knowledge from the self? She standing on the white lotus, does this signify the fact that the atma is dependent upon something other than itself in the experience of knowledge?

    This is absolutely fantastic subject matter that needs to be more thoroughly discussed. There are major misconceptions on this topic that create lots of confusion for people when trying to develop an understanding of the nature of the self. In order to discover the true self, people should know what they are looking for. Glories to Kesavsa!!

    • snd May 8, 2012

      Knowledge is vritti. Knowledge is seperate from atma. Atma is the possesor of knowledge. Atma is dependent on senses for knowledge.

    • Scooty Ram May 9, 2012

      A vritti always needs a substratum. What is the relation between the vritti and its substratum?

  • Gopinath Dasa May 10, 2012

    Thank you for this very well written, edited and presented article… congratualtions for the one person or the group of persons who did this nice work of nicely presenting this subtle philosophy of Dr Satya Narayana Dasa

    • purushottam das May 18, 2012

      we should be careful in selecting our words, it is not the subtle philosophy of Dr. Das but philosophy is presented subtly by dr. das. dr. das does not create philosophy but present it in all intricate and subtle nuances to us for our benefits.

      purushottam das

Comments are closed.