Preface to Tattva Sandarbha

Srila Jiva Gosvami

Srila Jiva Gosvami

Of the Six Sandarbhas, Tattva Sandarbha is the smallest in size, but not in importance. As its name suggests, it discusses the Reality (tattva) that is the ultimate subject to be understood and realized. Tattva also means “essence,” and thus Tattva Sandarbha provides the essence of what is to be elaborated upon in the rest of the Sandarbhas. Thus, it serves as an introduction to them.

It may be said that Tattva Sandarbha lays the foundation for entry into the subject matter of Bhāgavata Purāṇa, a detailed analysis of which follows in the rest of the Sandarbhas. It does so particularly by providing the epistemological viewing frame through which Bhagavān is directly intuited, devotionally served, and established ultimately as the supreme object of divine love.

The following is the preface to a completely revised edition of Tattva Sandarbha which will be published this summer. 

For thousands of years, India has been the land where people have molded their lifestyle in pursuit of spiritual realization. Many types of spiritual practices and theologies were developed, experimented with by religious specialists, and taken up by the masses. It was generally accepted that the ultimate goal of human life was to access the direct experience of Absolute Reality. Every aspect of human life, be it economic, social, political, moral, or religious, was designed to facilitate this ultimate aim. It is for this reason that knowledge systems or schools of thought were called darśana (lit., vision).

Today the word darśana is often translated as “philosophy” or “school of thought,” but that fails to capture its true meaning. Darśana signifies the vision of Reality. A darśana is a system that explains Reality, both empirical and transempirical, how it relates to the conscious self, and also provides a map of the path one can adopt to actualize moment to moment direct visioning capacity of that Reality.

Books like the Ṣaṭ Sandarbhas were written to help religious practitioners gain intuitive insight into Absolute Reality. In academic circles, however, there is a tacit consensus on remaining objective about religious studies. This “knowledge for its own sake” acts as a barrier preventing the investigator from directly accessing the interior states disclosed by realized authors of religious works. Such studies may serve academic goals without touching the spirit of the book or conveying the true intent of the author.

Proper Understanding of the Subject

In presenting the Ṣaṭ Sandarbhas, written by Jīva Gosvāmī, I have not been tied to any such constrictions. Being a practitioner of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism, my comments represent the viewpoint of an insider who was educated in the Gauḍīya tradition. I have tried to preserve the intention and spirit of Jīva Gosvāmī. My commentaries are written primarily for adherents of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism to help them fully comprehend its basic tenets so they may follow the path properly and achieve success. Correct understanding fortifies a person’s faith and supports effective practice. Improper understanding leads to wrong practice and a failure to achieve the desired outcome. It therefore, behooves every practitioner of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism to study the Sandarbhas carefully. It makes a world of difference when practice is undertaken with an accurate understanding of the subject.

Our human life is limited; time elapsed does not return. Therefore, we have to use it judiciously. In Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 11.29.22, Śrī Kṛṣṇa teaches that the real intelligence of the intelligent and the wisdom of the wise is to utilize the temporary material body to attain the Eternal. Thus, it is of utmost importance to gain a clear understanding of the darśana, so that one may walk with the unfailing vision toward the destination.

To give an example, even if you have a superb car in perfect condition, are a trained driver, driving on an excellent highway, and are alert, you will still end up in the wrong place if you have taken a wrong turn. Alternatively, even if you are walking leisurely on a dirt road, you will reach your goal sooner or later, as long as you are walking in the right direction. Every step you take brings you closer to the destination. Thus, the proper orientation to Reality is necessary for a sincere and serious seeker and practitioner.

Knowing the Prescriptions of Scripture

Spirituality is the path of enlightenment. To be successful, one must have a clear picture of the path as well as the goal. As it is said in Maitrayāṇī Upaniṣad 6.22, “One who is adept in the sound revelation of Brahman (śabda-brahma) attains the Supreme Brahman (para-brahma).” A practice that is not based on and not aligned with the proper meaning of śāstra (scripture) will not yield the desired result:

       yaḥ śāstra-vidhim utsṛjya vartate kāma-kārataḥ
       na sa siddhim avāpnoti na sukhaṁ na parāṁ gatim
       tasmāc chāstraṁ pramāṇaṁ te kāryākārya-vyavasthitau
       jñātvā śāstra-vidhānoktaṁ karma kartum ihārhasi

“One who, casting aside the ordinances of scripture, acts instead according to the impulse of material desire, attains neither perfection nor contentment nor the supreme goal. Therefore, scriptural revelation is the means of authentic knowing available to you in ascertaining what is to be done and what is to be avoided. You should perform action in this world only after knowing the prescriptions of scripture.” (Gītā 16.23–24)

Some sādhakas (those who undertake a specific spiritual practice) argue that the emphasis on discriminating scriptural knowledge is relevant only to the path of jñāna (knowledge) and has nothing to do with bhakti (devotion). This is a gross misconception. If such were the case, Jīva Gosvāmī and other ācāryas would not have labored so rigorously to write an abundance of literature. They were certainly not confused about the difference between bhakti and jñāna. Knowledge related to bhakti is also an integral part of bhakti and has nothing to do with jñāna-marga, the purpose of which is quite different. In fact, hearing (śravaṇam), which includes studying śāstra via the faculty of human rationality (mananam), is the first limb of bhakti.

Complete View of Reality through Shastra

Then there are others who opine that there is no need to study śāstra because bhakti itself, such as chanting the divine Names of Kṛṣṇa, will reveal everything. But how is this conclusion arrived at? Either it is known from śāstra or from somewhere else. If the latter option is the case, then such an understanding cannot be taken as authentic. If it is known from śāstra, such protagonists must accept the importance of śāstric knowledge and concur with the perspective that discloses its central importance. Furthermore, the idea that all knowledge is revealed through chanting of the Name is itself a scriptural teaching on the Name meant to emphasize its extraordinary power, not to minimize the importance of scripture. Moreover, it is from śāstra itself that the very process of authentic chanting is to be learned. Indeed, śāstra provides a complete view (darśana) of the Supreme Reality and of the means of Its attainment through bhakti. It is this vision alone that can make possible genuine devotion in any of its forms. So why would any serious aspirant to true knowledge of and love for God neglect to study the śāstra as a whole?

Another question that must be addressed in response to sādhakas who argue that scriptural knowledge is irrelevant to bhakti is this: Without authentic scriptural knowledge, how can a practitioner truly know what bhakti is and how to execute it properly?
Authentic knowledge of bhakti can be known only from śāstra. One’s practice must be aligned with the true understanding of the goal. On the yoga path, faulty practice of āsanas (physical postures) or incorrect prāṇāyāma (breathing exercises) is likely to damage one’s body or vital system over the course of time. In the same way, on the bhakti path, a perspective that is not recognized as valid and not aligned with the goal will not yield the desired result, but can cause mental and spiritual complications. Regular practice improperly performed may be slow to deliver its detrimental consequences, but, in the long run, the cumulative repercussions are significant. It is comparable to making use of a powerful and appropriate medicine, yet doing so in an unprescribed manner.

Need to Study the Sandarbhas

Millions of people pursue the path of bhakti; yet, even after decades of practice, only a few of them are observed to have arrived at or near the goal. If an astute business person is not gaining success or a dedicated athlete is failing to achieve his desired goal, then that person will analyze the cause and look to correct himself. He will consult an expert or a coach in his field. Similarly, it behooves a sincere seeker of Reality to do the same thing and investigate the cause behind one’s lack of progress. The most likely reason is either deficiency in or incompleteness of, one’s root understanding, and outlook, which inform and pattern every detail regarding self-concept, God-concept, life-view, and the practice of devotion. Authenticity of practice can arise only from a genuine understanding of Reality, process, and goal.

Since Śrī Jīva composed the Ṣaṭ Sandarbhas to make both the process and the goal crystal clear, there is a great need to study these texts. They have served practitioners for centuries and represent a thoroughly tested and validated body of evidence. Previously this knowledge was locked in Sanskrit and not many had access to it. Now it is available in English and a sincere seeker should take advantage of it. If one is dedicating time and energy in pursuit of one’s goal, one will fare better if one clearly understands the process as well as the goal. The Ṣaṭ Sandarbhas award this knowledge, dispelling all doubts.

Notify me of new articles

Comments ( 4 )
  1. Jagannatha dasa

    Hare Krsna!,

    Can independent study of the Bhakti Sastras, without the guidance or instructions of a Vaisnava be considered Bhakti ? Sravana is considered as Bhakti but sva-adhyaya is not mentioned as a limb of Bhakti, is it because in case of Sravana there is a higher Vaisnava giving instructions or under whom the Shastras are being studied ?

    Your servant,
    Jagannatha das

    • snd

      Bhakti is of various types. Pure bhakti begins with taking shelter of a devotee of Bhagavan.
      Svadhyaya is also part of bhakti. There are many statements in scripture to this effect. For example in Bhagavad Gita (18.70) Shri Krishna says that anyone who studies the Gita worships Him by the yajna of knowledge. Worship is certainly part of bhakti.
      Really speaking, bhakti is not limited to any specific action or set of actions. This is the universal nature of bhakti. The very definition of bhakti is to perform action in relation to Krishna with a favorable mood, anukulyena krishnanushilanam. This includes all types of actions, even activities such as taking care of your body, if it is done in conformity to above definition. Once a person surrrenders to Bhagavan Krishna, his or her every action is bhakti. This subject is dealt with in great detail in Bhakti Sandarbha.

  2. Vraja Kishor

    “In presenting the Ṣaṭ Sandarbhas, written by Jīva Gosvāmī, I have not been tied to any such constrictions. Being a practitioner of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism, my comments represent the viewpoint of an insider who was educated in the Gauḍīya tradition. I have tried to preserve the intention and spirit of Jīva Gosvāmī. My commentaries are written primarily for adherents of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism to help them fully comprehend its basic tenets so they may follow the path properly and achieve success.”

    JAYA!

    “Some sādhakas (those who undertake a specific spiritual practice) argue that the emphasis on discriminating scriptural knowledge is relevant only to the path of jñāna (knowledge) and has nothing to do with bhakti (devotion). This is a gross misconception. If such were the case, Jīva Gosvāmī and other ācāryas would not have labored so rigorously to write an abundance of literature. They were certainly not confused about the difference between bhakti and jñāna. Knowledge related to bhakti is also an integral part of bhakti and has nothing to do with jñāna-marga, the purpose of which is quite different. In fact, hearing (śravaṇam), which includes studying śāstra via the faculty of human rationality (mananam), is the first limb of bhakti.”

    JAYA JAYA!!

    “Millions of people pursue the path of bhakti; yet, even after decades of practice, only a few of them are observed to have arrived at or near the goal. If an astute business person is not gaining success or a dedicated athlete is failing to achieve his desired goal, then that person will analyze the cause and look to correct himself. He will consult an expert or a coach in his field. Similarly, it behooves a sincere seeker of Reality to do the same thing and investigate the cause behind one’s lack of progress… Since Śrī Jīva composed the Ṣaṭ Sandarbhas to make both the process and the goal crystal clear, there is a great need to study these texts. They have served practitioners for centuries and represent a thoroughly tested and validated body of evidence.”

    JAYA JAYA JAYA!!!

  3. Jagannatha dasa

    Thank you Babaji for your nice reply !

  • Satyanarayana Dasa

    Satyanarayana Dasa
  • Subscribe

  • Videos with Babaji

  • Payment

  • Article Archive

  • Chronological Archive

  • Translate this Website

    Homepage Übersetzung

© 2017 JIVA.ORG. All rights reserved.